skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Search for: All records

Creators/Authors contains: "Woo, Han Byul"

Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge during the embargo (administrative interval).
What is a DOI Number?

Some links on this page may take you to non-federal websites. Their policies may differ from this site.

  1. Abstract Variations in subsurface flow processes through a karst aquifer that feeds Bear Spring in southeastern Minnesota were captured on a temporary seismic network during injection experiments and a natural recharge event. Each experiment involved injecting ∼13,000 L of water into an overflow spring, and the natural event was triggered by a large rainstorm of ∼70 min in duration. During the injection experiments, the largest amplitude signals in the ground velocity seismograms occurred as the water first fell onto the rock at the overflow spring and as the large slug of water reached a sump or water‐filled passage. During the natural rainstorm event, the overflow spring began flowing and total spring discharge (perennial emanation points and the overflow spring) increased from ∼100 to 300 L/s. Seismic signals during and following the rain event include broadband noise from raindrops impacting the ground, as well as large amplitude signals while water levels rose; the latter occurred over a 5‐s period, producing multiple pulses of ground motion up to ∼0.5 mm/s. Based on seismic array analysis, high frequency signals during the natural recharge event and one of the injection experiments are largely sourced from south of the array, where a sump exists and the conduit orientation changes, but additional modeling is required to further understand which of a set of possible mechanisms is mostly likely the cause of these seismic signals. 
    more » « less